This is a Survey of blog and wiki resources on the theory of signs, variously known as semeiotic or semiotics, and the actions referred to as semiosis which transform signs among themselves in relation to their objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce’s concept of triadic sign relations.
Elements
Sources
Blog Series
- Sign Relations • Anthesis • Definition • Signs and Inquiry • Examples • Dyadic Aspects • Denotation • Connotation • Ennotation • Semiotic Equivalence Relations (1) (2)
- Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • (1)
Blog Dialogs
- Icon Index Symbol • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6) • (7) • (8) • (9) • (10) • (11) • (12) • (13) • (14) • (15) • (16) • (17) • (18) • (19) • (20)
- Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relations • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6) • (7) • (8) • (9) • (10) • (11)
References
- Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1992), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, The Eleventh International Human Science Research Conference, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan.
- Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15(1), pp. 40–52. Archive. Journal. Online (doc) (pdf).
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Laws of Form • Ontolog
cc: FB | Semeiotics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Triadic Relations • Discussion 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relation Theory • Discussion 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry