Re: Ontolog Forum • Ronald Stamper
Concrete examples are very instructive in this arena, and when it comes to refutations a single counter-example serves to puncture many a fallacious general proposition.
Here’s a couple of articles, illustrated with concrete examples of a fundamental character, affording a bare minimum introduction to triadic relations along with their reducibility and irreducibility properties.
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 9 | Systems Community of Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6 | Systems Community of Inquiry