Tag Archives: Relation Theory

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 8

Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • (5) • (7) Re: FB | Semeiotics • Gary Herstein Continuing questions about “infinite semiosis” vs. “unbounded semiosis” prompt me to make another comment by way of bringing our focus to bear on the … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 7

Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5 It’s a common mistake to confound infinite with unbounded.  A process can continue without end and still be “bounded in a nutshell”.  So a sign process can pass from sign to interpretant sign … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 6

Questions about the use of “semiotic triangles” and “semiotic triskelia” to represent triadic sign relations have come up again, as they often do in the wider world, prompting me to revisit an earlier comment on the subject and to tri, … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1

This is a Survey of blog and wiki resources relating to the theory of signs (variously known as semeiotic or semiotics) and the interplay (known as semiosis) of signs and their objects, as based on C.S. Peirce’s concept of triadic sign … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes : 32

Re: FB | Foundations of Mathematics • John Corcoran There was a huge — and of course ultimately futile — discussion of truth theories back in 2005 when the Wikipediot article on Truth was under development.  Pragmatists of one stripe … Continue reading

Posted in Analogy, C.S. Peirce, Communication, Descriptive Science, Fixation of Belief, Formal Systems, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Normative Science, Paradigms, Peirce, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5

Re: Richard Coyne • Recursion Again It’s a common mistake to confound infinite with unbounded.  A process can continue without end and still be “bounded in a nutshell”.  So a sign process can pass from sign to interpretant sign to … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Discussion 2

Re: Ecology of Systems Thinking • RS • TM My previous comment summed up my observations of a general drift toward “absolutist and dyadic ways of thinking” in various communities of inquiry of interest to me over the past 20 … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Differential Logic, Duality, Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Matrices, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Predicate Calculus, Propositional Calculus, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Teridentity, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment