Category Archives: Intentionality

The object of reasoning is to find out …

Posted on January 23, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

No longer wondered what I would do in life but defined my object. — C.S. Peirce (1861), “My Life, written for the Class-Book”, (CE 1, 3) The object of reasoning is to find out, from the consideration of what we already … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Determination, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intention, Intentional Contexts, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Purpose, Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Sign Relational Manifolds • 3

Posted on November 3, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

I’m not sure when it was I first noticed the relationship between manifolds and semiotics but I distinctly recall the passage in Serge Lang’s Differential and Riemannian Manifolds which brought the triadic character of tangent vectors into high relief.  I … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Differential Geometry, Differential Logic, Geometry, Intentionality, Logic, Manifolds, Mathematics, Riemann, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

De In Esse Predication • Preliminaries

Posted on May 23, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Questions have arisen in several places about classical logic and its vicissitudes, what used to be called “deviant logics” in some circles, all of which I recall being hot topics and much-mooted questions when I was a young wffer-snapper and Novice … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Connotation, Denotation, Extension, Indication, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Intension, Intention, Intentionality, Logic, Peirce, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Constraints and Indications • 2

Posted on July 4, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Joseph Simpson Coping with collaboration, communication, context, integration, interoperability, perspective, purpose, and the reality of the information dimension demands a transition from conceptual environments bounded by dyadic relations to those informed by triadic relations, especially the … Continue reading →

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Constraint, Control, Cybernetics, Determination, Error-Controlled Regulation, Feedback, Indication, Indicator Functions, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Intentionality, Learning Theory, Peirce, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Triadic Forms of Constraint, Determination, Interaction • 3

Posted on April 24, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

In the beginning was the three-pointed star, One smile of light across the empty face; One bough of bone across the rooting air, The substance forked that marrowed the first sun; And, burning ciphers on the round of space, Heaven … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Constraint, Determination, Discovery, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Law of Nature, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Semeiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Triadic Forms of Constraint, Determination, Interaction • 2

Posted on April 23, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Gary Richmond Here’s one way of stating what I call a constraint: The set is constrained to a subset of the set Here’s one way of stating a triadic constraint: The set is a subset … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Constraint, Determination, Discovery, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Law of Nature, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Semeiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Triadic Forms of Constraint, Determination, Interaction • 1

Posted on April 23, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • JA • GR • JA • JBD There are many places where Peirce uses the word object in the full pragmatic sense, so much so that it demands a very selective attention not to remark … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Constraint, Determination, Discovery, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Law of Nature, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Semeiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The object of reasoning is to find out …

Posted on April 20, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

No longer wondered what I would do in life but defined my object. — C.S. Peirce (1861), “My Life, written for the Class-Book”, (CE 1, 3) The object of reasoning is to find out, from the consideration of what we already … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Determination, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intention, Intentional Contexts, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Purpose, Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Homunculomorphisms • 2

Posted on February 12, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: John Baez • The Internal Model Principle There’s a far-ranging discussion that takes off from this point, touching on links among analogical reasoning, arrows and functors, cybernetic images, iconic versus symbolic representations, mental models, systems simulations, etc., and just … Continue reading →

Posted in Analogy, Ashby, Automata, Control Systems, Cybernetics, Homunculi, Homunculomorphisms, Iconicity, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intentionality, Internal Models, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Model Theory, Optimal Control, Peirce, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Homunculomorphisms • 1

Posted on February 11, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: John Baez • The Internal Model Principle Ashby’s book was my own first introduction to cybernetics and I recently returned to his discussion of regulation games in connection with some issues in Peirce’s theory of inquiry. In that context … Continue reading →

Posted in Ashby, Automata, Category Theory, Control, Control Systems, Control Theory, Cybernetics, Homunculi, Homunculomorphisms, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intentionality, Internal Models, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Optimal Control, Peirce, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment