Re: Interpretive Duality in Logical Graphs • 1
Re: Mathematical Duality in Logical Graphs • 1
Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson

LA:

Definition 1.  A group is a set together with a binary operation satisfying the following three conditions.

1. Associativity.  For any we have
2. Identity.  There is an identity element such that
   we have
3. Inverses.  Each element has an inverse, that is, for each
   there is some such that

Dear Lyle,

Thanks for supplying that definition of a mathematical group.  It will afford us a wealth of useful concepts and notations as we proceed.  As you know, the above three axioms define what is properly called an abstract group.  Over the course of group theory’s history that definition was gradually abstracted from the more concrete examples of permutation groups and transformation groups initially arising in the theory of equations and their solvability.

As it happens, the application of group theory I’ll be developing over the next several posts will be using the more concrete type of structure, where a transformation group is said to “act on” a set by permuting its elements among themselves.  In the work we do here, each group we contemplate will act a set which may be viewed as either one of two things, either a canonical set of expressions in a formal language or the mathematical objects denoted by those expressions.

What you say about deriving arithmetic, algebra, group theory, and all the rest from the calculus of indications may well be true, but it remains to be shown if so, and that’s a ways down the road from here.

Resources

• Logic Syllabus
• Logical Graphs • First Impressions
• Logical Graphs • Formal Development

cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form • Ma^thstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science