Category Archives: Experience

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 5

Posted on April 11, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Peirce List (1) (2) • John Sowa (1) (2) Re: Peirce List • Jon Alan Schmidt JAS: Thanks for providing a longer excerpt of that passage than I did, including Peirce’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 4

Posted on April 10, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: Here Peirce is confusing Truth and Falsity with Good and Evil.  The Creator of the Universe (CotU) created Truth and Falsity when He drew the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 3

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, I used to think I knew what Peirce was talking about in this passage but it looks like it may be time … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 2

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, The way I understand Peirce’s parable, he is asking, “How do we arrive at a condition far enough removed from our immersion … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 1

Posted on April 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment (1) (2) I am getting a feeling I occasionally get when discussing Peirce’s work in a group setting — as though we had … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention

Posted on April 7, 2012 by Jon Awbrey

Selections from C.S. Peirce, “The Logic of Relatives”, CP 3.456–552 488.   The general method of graphical representation of propositions has now been given in all its essential elements, except, of course, that we have not, as yet, studied any truths … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments