Tag Archives: Peirce

Pragmatic Traction • 2

Re: Facebook Discussion • Richard Saunders I’m about to be diverted for a couple of weeks but this is an ever-ongoing question so I know I’ll be coming back to it again.  The short shrift goes a bit like this … Continue reading

Posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Control, Cybernetics, Deborah G. Mayo, Deduction, Error, Error-Controlled Regulation, Feedback, Fixation of Belief, Hypothesis, Induction, Inference, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Knowledge, Knowledge Representation, Learning, Learning Theory, Likelihood, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Pragmatic Information, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Probability, Probable Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Statistical Inference, Statistics, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pragmatic Traction • 1

Deborah G. Mayo • Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis C.S. Peirce’s pragmatic maxim marks the place where the tire of theory meets the test track of experience — it tells us how general ideas are impacted by practical consequences.  … Continue reading

Posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Control, Cybernetics, Deborah G. Mayo, Deduction, Error, Error-Controlled Regulation, Feedback, Fixation of Belief, Hypothesis, Induction, Inference, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Knowledge, Knowledge Representation, Learning, Learning Theory, Likelihood, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Pragmatic Information, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Probability, Probable Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Statistical Inference, Statistics, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimal Negation Operators • 4

Re: Laws Of Form Discussion • Minimal Negation Operators Defining minimal negation operators over a more conventional basis is next in order of logic, if not necessarily in order of every reader’s reading.  For what it’s worth and against the … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimal Negation Operators • 3

Re: Laws Of Form Discussion • Minimal Negation Operators • AM It will take a few more rounds of stage-setting before I can get to concrete examples of applications but the following should indicate the direction of generalization embodied in … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimal Negation Operators • 2

Re: Laws Of Form Discussion • Minimal Negation Operators The brief description of minimal negation operators given in the previous post is enough to convey the rule of their construction.  For future reference, a slightly more formal definition is given … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimal Negation Operators • 1

To accommodate moderate levels of complexity in the application of logical graphs our organon needs a class of organules called “minimal negation operators”. Brief Introduction A minimal negation operator is a logical connective that says “just one false” of its … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 10

Re: Laws Of Form Discussion With any formal system it is easy to spend a long time roughing out primitives and reviewing first principles before getting on to practical applications, and logical graphs are no different in that respect.  But … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Automated Research Tools, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Iconicity, Information Theory, Inquiry, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Peirce's Law, Pragmatic Maxim, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Spencer Brown, Symbolism, Systems Theory, Theorem Proving, Topology, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment