Category Archives: Group Theory

Riffs and Rotes : 3

Re: R.J. Lipton • Failure Of Unique Factorization My favorite question in this realm is how much of the linear ordering of the natural numbers is purely combinatorial, where we eliminate all the structure that isn’t purely combinatorial via the … Continue reading

Posted in Algebra, Combinatorics, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Mathematics, Number Theory, Riffs and Rotes | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relations & Their Relatives : 15

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Helmut Raulien Definitions and examples for relation composition and the two types of relation reduction that commonly arise can be found in the following articles: Relation Composition Relation Reduction A previous post on this thread … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives : 14

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Helmut Raulien Cf: Relation Reduction : Examples of Projectively Reducible Relations I constructed the “Ann and Bob” examples of sign relations back when I was enrolled in a Systems Engineering program and had to explain … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives : 13

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Helmut Raulien The facts about relational reducibility are relatively easy to understand and I included links to relevant discussions in my earlier survey of relation theory. The following article discusses relational reducibility and irreducibility in … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives : 12

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Jeffrey Brian Downard In viewing the structures of relation spaces, even the smallest dyadic cases we’ve been exploring so far, no one need feel nonplussed at the lack of obviousness in this domain.  Anyone who … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives : 11

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Jeffrey Brian Downard In discussing the “combinatorial explosion” of dyadic relations that takes off in passing from a universe of two elements to a universe of three elements, I made the following observation: Looking back … Continue reading

Posted in Combinatorics, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Forest Primeval → Riffs & Rotes

Re: Shifting Paradigms? • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6) Prompted by the discussion of Catalan numbers on the Foundations Of Math List, I dug up a few pieces of early correspondence and later discussions that … Continue reading

Posted in Algebra, Arithmetic, Combinatorics, Forest Primeval, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Integer Sequences, Lambda Calculus, Logic, Mathematics, Model Theory, Number Theory, Paradigms, Peirce, Programming, Proof Theory, Riffs and Rotes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment