Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8

Information Channeled

Suppose we find ourselves in the classification‑augmented or sign‑enhanced situation of uncertainty shown in Figure 5.  What difference does it make to our state of information regarding the objective outcome if we heed one or the other of the two signs, “A” or “B”, at least, operating on the charitable assumption we grasp the significance of each sign?

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Figure 5

  • Under the sign “A” our uncertainty is reduced from \log 5 to \log 3.
  • Under the sign “B” our uncertainty is reduced from \log 5 to \log 2.

The above characteristics of the relation between uncertainty and information allow us to define the information capacity of a communication channel as the average uncertainty reduction on receiving a sign, a formula with the splendid mnemonic “AURORAS”.

cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of FormMathstodonOntologAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.