Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 7

Uncertainty Moderated

In many ways the provision of information, a process which serves to reduce uncertainty, operates as an inverse process in relation to the type of uncertainty augmentation which takes place in compound decisions.  By way of illustrating the relation in question, let us return to our initial example.

A set of signs enters on a setup like that as a system of middle terms, a collection of signs one may regard, aptly enough, as constellating a medium.

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Figure 5

The language or medium in Figure 5 is the set of signs \{ ``A", ``B" \}.  On the assumption the initial 5 outcomes are equally likely it is possible to associate a frequency distribution (k_1, k_2) = (3, 2) and thus a probability distribution (p_1, p_2) = (\frac{3}{5}, \frac{2}{5}) = (0.6, 0.4) with the language, thereby defining a communication channel.

The most important thing at this stage of development is simply to get a first handle on the “conditions for the possibility of signs making sense”, but once we have that much in hand we can begin constructing the rough and ready pieces of information-theoretic furniture we need, like measures of uncertainty, channel capacity, and the amount of information associated with the reception or the recognition of a single sign.

cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of FormMathstodonOntologAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 7

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.