Category Archives: Gödel Numbers

Higher Order Sign Relations • 6

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • 4 Re: Relations, Types, Functions Re: Cybernetics • Cliff Joslyn Cliff Joslyn recommends the following books. Spivak, David I. (2014), Category Theory for the Sciences Fong, Brendan, and Spivak, David I. (2019), An Invitation … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • 5

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • 4 Re: Conceptual Graphs • Gary Zhu GZ: Is there any good contemporary reading of Peirce & James that you recommend?  Their original works have been quite challenging for me. Dear Gary, As fortune … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • 4

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations • 3 Re: Relations, Types, Functions Re: Cybernetics • Cliff Joslyn CJ: Categorical approaches to systems theory have been very attractive to me for a long time.  My current work is categorically adjacent, and I’m … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • 3

Re: Ontolog Forum • Joseph Simpson Re: Relations, Types, Functions JA: The subject matters of relations, types, and functions enjoy a form of recursive involvement with one another which makes it difficult to know where to get on and where to … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Higher Order Sign Relations • 2

Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce Society • John Corcoran Questions about use and mention came up recently on Facebook.  In pragmatic semiotics the trade-off between “signs-of-objects” and “signs-as-objects” opens up the wider space of “higher order sign relations”.  In … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Forest Primeval → Riffs & Rotes

Re: Shifting Paradigms? • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6) Prompted by the discussion of Catalan numbers on the Foundations Of Math List, I dug up a few pieces of early correspondence and later discussions that … Continue reading

Posted in Algebra, Arithmetic, C.S. Peirce, Catalan Numbers, Combinatorics, Forest Primeval, Foundations of Mathematics, Gödel Numbers, Graph Theory, Group Theory, H.W. Gould, Integer Sequences, Logic, Martin Gardner, Mathematics, Neil Sloane, Number Theory, Paradigmata, Peirce, Planted Plane Trees, Programming, Riffs and Rotes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment