Category Archives: Gödel Numbers

Higher Order Sign Relations • 3

Re: Higher Order Sign Relations Re: Ontolog Forum • Joseph Simpson Travel delayed … so I have a little time … JA: The subject matters of relations, types, and functions enjoy a form of recursive involvement with one another which … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Higher Order Sign Relations • 2

Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce Society • John Corcoran Questions about use and mention came up recently on Facebook.  In pragmatic semiotics the trade-off between signs-of-objects and signs-as-objects opens up the wider space of “higher order sign relations”.  Here … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Peirce, Quotation, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forest Primeval → Riffs & Rotes

Re: Shifting Paradigms? • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6) Prompted by the discussion of Catalan numbers on the Foundations Of Math List, I dug up a few pieces of early correspondence and later discussions that … Continue reading

Posted in Algebra, Arithmetic, C.S. Peirce, Catalan Numbers, Combinatorics, Forest Primeval, Foundations of Mathematics, Gödel Numbers, Graph Theory, Group Theory, H.W. Gould, Integer Sequences, Logic, Martin Gardner, Mathematics, Neil Sloane, Number Theory, Paradigmata, Peirce, Planted Plane Trees, Programming, Riffs and Rotes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment