Tag Archives: Semiotics

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 5

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Peirce List (1) (2) • John Sowa (1) (2) Re: Peirce List • Jon Alan Schmidt JAS: Thanks for providing a longer excerpt of that passage than I did, including Peirce’s … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 4

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: Here Peirce is confusing Truth and Falsity with Good and Evil.  The Creator of the Universe (CotU) created Truth and Falsity when He drew the … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 3

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, I used to think I knew what Peirce was talking about in this passage but it looks like it may be time … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 2

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn Dear Kollbjorn, The way I understand Peirce’s parable, he is asking, “How do we arrive at a condition far enough removed from our immersion … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relatives Of Second Intention • Comment 1

Re: C.S. Peirce • Relatives of Second Intention Re: Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment (1) (2) I am getting a feeling I occasionally get when discussing Peirce’s work in a group setting — as though we had … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Experience, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment 2

Re: Peirce List • Mauro Bertani Dear Mauro, My access to the internet is limited today — maybe I can make a start toward addressing your comments by linking to an article on “sole sufficient operators” in boolean algebra and … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Critical Thinking, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Paradisaical Logic and the After Math • Comment 1

Re: Peter Cameron • Cultures, Tribes, or Just an Illusion? Re: Peirce List • (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) One of those recurring themes — you might call it “The Power of Negative Thinking” — arose this time on … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, C.S. Peirce, Critical Thinking, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Logical Reflexion, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Second Intentions, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Truth Theory, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

All Process, No Paradox • 9

In the midst of this strife, whereat the halls of Ilúvatar shook and a tremor ran out into the silences yet unmoved, Ilúvatar arose a third time, and his face was terrible to behold.  Then he raised up both his … Continue reading

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Paradox, Peirce, Process, Semiotics, Spencer Brown, Systems Theory, Tertium Quid, Time, Tolkien | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Discussion 21

Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Kollbjorn Oldtheyn • Edward Buckner On the question of which later developments in logic Peirce anticipated, I’ve been more focused on the points where he saw through to features we would not see again … Continue reading

Posted in Abduction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Definition, Determination, Extension, Hypothesis, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Intention, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Measurement, Observation, Peirce, Perception, Phenomenology, Physics, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatism, Probability, Quantum Mechanics, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 15

Re: C.S. Peirce, Spencer Brown, and Me • 11 Re: Ontolog Forum • Michael DeBellis MDB: I’ve just started taking Peirce seriously in the last year or so and some of his more complex ideas still aren’t completely clear to … Continue reading

Posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment