Category Archives: Knowledge Representation

Conceptual Barriers • 3

Re: Ontolog Forum • Paola Di Maio Partly this discussion and partly just the mood I’m in brought to mind a motley assortment of old reminiscences.  My first years in college I oscillated (or vacillated) between math and physics, eventually … Continue reading

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Conceptual Barriers, Conceptual Integration, Constraint, Indication, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Intentionality, Knowledge Representation, Peirce, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scholarship of Integration, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Conceptual Barriers • 2

Re: Ontolog Forum • Paola Di Maio Synchronicity being what it is, here for your contemplation are two pictures from a current discussion on Facebook. See Tables 8 and 9 in the following article and section: Application of Higher Order … Continue reading

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Conceptual Barriers, Conceptual Integration, Constraint, Indication, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Intentionality, Knowledge Representation, Peirce, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scholarship of Integration, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Conceptual Barriers • 1

Re: Ontolog Forum • John Sowa My first year at college the university held a cross-campus colloquium taking its theme from C.P. Snow’s Two Cultures about the need for and difficulties of cross-disciplinary communication and collaboration in our day.  The … Continue reading

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Conceptual Barriers, Conceptual Integration, Constraint, Indication, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Intentionality, Knowledge Representation, Peirce, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scholarship of Integration, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 8

Re: Systems Science • LT It’s been a while since I started this thread, with many sidetrips and tangents, so let me go back to the top and expand on the motivations I expressed there, addressing a few issues that … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 7

Re: Systems Science • JS Let’s stand back from the picture and see how the dimensions of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics look from a pragmatic semiotic or sign relational perspective. is an object domain, a set of elements under view … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 6

Re: Systems Science • JS A few of my readers are racing well ahead of me, exploring a range of different roads, but I’ll be making a dogged effort to stick to my math-bio-graphical narrative this time around, and try … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 5

Re: Systems Science • JS Yes, all these strands are strongly entangled. I had already spent a full decade wrestling with the works of Charles Sanders Peirce and George Spencer Brown before my need to figure out what they were … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment