Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • Discussion 1

Re: Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 1
Re: Academia.eduStephen Duplantier

SD:
The best way for me to read Peirce is as if he was writing poetry.  So if his algebra is poetry — I imagine him approving of the approach since he taught me abduction in the first place — there is room to wander.  With this, I venture the idea that his “wide field” is a local algebraic geography far from the tended garden.  There, where weeds and wild things grow and hybridize are the non‑dichotomic mathematics.

“Abdeuces Are Wild”, as they say, maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon …

As far as my own guess, and a lot of my wandering in pursuit of it goes, I’d venture Peirce’s field of vision opens up not so much from dichotomic to trichotomic domains of value as from dyadic to triadic relations, and all that with particular significance into the medium of reflection afforded by triadic sign relations.

Resources

cc: FB | Logical GraphsLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • Discussion 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.