Re: Laws Of Form Discussion • Minimal Negation Operators
Defining minimal negation operators over a more conventional basis is next in order of logic, if not necessarily in order of every reader’s reading. For what it’s worth and against the day when it may be needed, here is a definition of minimal negations in terms of and
Formal Definition
To express the general case of in terms of familiar operations, it helps to introduce an intermediary concept:
Definition. Let the function be defined for each integer in the interval by the following equation:
Then is defined by the following equation:
If we take the boolean product or the logical conjunction to indicate the point in the space then the minimal negation indicates the set of points in that differ from in exactly one coordinate. This makes a discrete functional analogue of a pointomitted neighborhood in ordinary real analysis, more exactly, a pointomitted distanceone neighborhood. In this light, the minimal negation operator can be recognized as a differential construction, an observation that opens a very wide field.
The remainder of this discussion proceeds on the algebraic convention that the plus sign and the summation symbol both refer to addition mod 2. Unless otherwise noted, the boolean domain is interpreted for logic in such a way that and This has the following consequences:

The operation is a function equivalent to the exclusive disjunction of and while its fiber of is the relation of inequality between and

The operation maps the bit sequence to its parity.
The following properties of the minimal negation operators may be noted:

The function is the same as that associated with the operation and the relation

In contrast, is not identical to

More generally, the function for is not identical to the boolean sum

The inclusive disjunctions indicated for the of more than one argument may be replaced with exclusive disjunctions without affecting the meaning since the terms in disjunction are already disjoint.
Resources