Category Archives: Mathematics

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 23

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto • Alex Shkotin Having lost my concentration to another round of home reconstruction disruption, let me loop back to the texts from Roberto and Alex which drew me into this discussion last week. RR: … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Differential Logic • Discussion 15

Re: Differential Logic • Comment 7 Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: Differentials and partial differentials over the real numbers work because one can pick two real numbers that are arbitrarily close to one another.  The difference between … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Frankl Conjecture, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Surveys, Time, Topology, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Differential Logic • Comment 7

Re: John Baez • Cyclic Identity for Partial Derivatives • Maxwell’s Relations (1) (2) (3) Much fun can be had by trying to do differentials and partial differentials over the boolean domain instead of the reals I took a first whack … Continue reading

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Amphecks, Belief Systems, Boole, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Fixation of Belief, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Optimization, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Differential Logic • Comment 7

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 22

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto (1) (2) RR: What’s your view on: When to create a greater-than-binary relation rather than a binary relation? Consider:  You want to represent some information, statement, or knowledge, without necessarily being forced to limit … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Re: Ontolog Forum • Alex Shkotin AS: Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (1) (2) (3) Dear Robert, I’ve been reviewing the discussions of August on this topic and I think it might be possible to advance our inquiry and even establish new levels of competence in … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Riffs and Rotes • 59281

Re: Persiflage • 59281 Numberfile • What’s Special About 59,281? If is prime then the decimal expansion of repeats, so it makes sense to talk about the “average” of the digits of   The average can be bigger than equal … Continue reading

Posted in Arithmetic, Combinatorics, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Logic, Mathematics, Number Theory, Riffs and Rotes | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 2

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • Gary Richmond JA: Well, it’s true, all science is under construction. But not everything under construction is a science. GR: True.  But I’d suggest that there is no good reason to block the … Continue reading

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 1

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • John Sowa JFS: I detect a prebit of irony in your note. Although I respect Peirce’s ethics of terminology and observe his recommendations when they are appropriate and realistic, I also know that … Continue reading

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 16

Re: FB | Semeiotics • Marius V. Constantin MVC: Have you taken into consideration the difference between weak negation and strong negation? I always begin classically where logic is concerned — I guess that means “strong” negation — we make … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment