Monthly Archives: September 2021

Minimal Negation Operators • Discussion 1

Re: Minimal Negation Operators • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) Re: Peirce List (1) (2) • Imran Makani IM: In his first post on this thread Jon clearly says that [minimal negation operators] were developed from Peirce’s alpha … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Differential Logic, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Semiotics, Venn Diagrams, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 18

Re: FB | Medieval Logic • Edward Buckner (1) (2) Edward Buckner raised a few questions about the sign relations implicit in Aristotle’s treatise “On Interpretation”, prompting the following thoughts on my part. On Pragmata The object of a sign … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 23

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto • Alex Shkotin Having lost my concentration to another round of home reconstruction disruption, let me loop back to the texts from Roberto and Alex which drew me into this discussion last week. RR: … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Susan Awbrey • I Looked Up

I Looked Up I looked up and I was old       The loose, wrinkled skin       The lines that leave their traces I looked up and I was old       The scars of former … Continue reading

Posted in Guest Post, Susan Awbrey | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic • Discussion 15

Re: Differential Logic • Comment 7 Re: Laws of Form • Lyle Anderson LA: Differentials and partial differentials over the real numbers work because one can pick two real numbers that are arbitrarily close to one another.  The difference between … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Frankl Conjecture, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Surveys, Time, Topology, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Differential Logic • Comment 7

Re: John Baez • Cyclic Identity for Partial Derivatives • Maxwell’s Relations (1) (2) (3) Much fun can be had by trying to do differentials and partial differentials over the boolean domain instead of the reals I took a first whack … Continue reading

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Amphecks, Belief Systems, Boole, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Fixation of Belief, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Optimization, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Differential Logic • Comment 7

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 22

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto (1) (2) RR: What’s your view on: When to create a greater-than-binary relation rather than a binary relation? Consider:  You want to represent some information, statement, or knowledge, without necessarily being forced to limit … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 3

Re: Peirce List • (1) (2) Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 2 The fact most neglected about the Neglected Argument is its character as an abductive argument, a “Holy Guess” if you will to believe, and as such the … Continue reading

Posted in Anthem, Balance, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Re: Ontolog Forum • Alex Shkotin AS: Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (1) (2) (3) Dear Robert, I’ve been reviewing the discussions of August on this topic and I think it might be possible to advance our inquiry and even establish new levels of competence in … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments