Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 17

Re: Peirce List • Robert Marty (1) (2) (3)

Dear Robert,

I’ve been reviewing the discussions of August on this topic and I think it might be possible to advance our inquiry and even establish new levels of competence in our theory of signs if we examined the main points again and dedicated ourselves to clearing up the subject’s more persistent enigmas.

As I was preparing to recap our earlier discussions, it gradually dawned on me how one issue more than any other is the source of major misunderstanding and a whole lot of “people talking past each other”, as the saying goes.  To put it succinctly if very roughly, it has to do with the difference between people who have tests in search of answers and people who have answers in search of tests.  I say very roughly because it’s clear all of us are all of those people some of the time.  And yet we do see cognitive bifurcations and cultural divides persisting through time and people sorting to one basin or the other for extended periods if not the duration of a lifetime.

I’ll take up a tactic for dealing with that issue next time.

Regards,

Jon

cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics (1) (2)Ontolog Forum • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4)
cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of FormStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.