Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Re: Ontolog ForumAlex Shkotin

Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. arity is a feature of relation itself.  So […] we come here to the logic of relations and its discovery.  For me, examples of relations of different arity from one or another domain would be great.

Here’s a first introduction to k-adic or k-ary relations from a mathematical perspective.

Here’s a few additional resources and assorted discussions with folks around the web.

More than anything else it is critical to understand the differences among the following things.

  1. The relation itself, which is a mathematical object,
    a subset embedded in a cartesian product of several
    sets called the “domains” of the relation.
  2. The individual k-tuple, sometimes called an “elementary relation”,
    a single element of the relation and therefore of the cartesian product.
  3. The syntactic forms, lexical or graphical or whatever,
    used to describe elements and subsets of the relation.
  4. The real phenomena and real situations, empirical or quasi-empirical,
    which we use mathematical objects such as numbers, sets, functions,
    graphs, groups, algebras, manifolds, relations, etc. to model, at least
    approximately and well enough to cope with the realities in practice.

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Relation TheoryLaws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

  1. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.