Reflective Interpretive Frameworks • Incident 1

Re: William Waites • The Agent That Doesn’t Know Itself

WW:  ❝Why Has Nobody Done This?❞

People who study C.S. Peirce would say reflective reasoning requires triadic relations at core and there is work being done on that.  One of the challenges is clarifying the role of triadic relations in category theory and raising them into higher relief as fundamental operations.

  • Note.  I was looking for a word to describe a random encounter with something that jogs one’s memory of a recurring theme — incident plays into the reflection theme and looked worth trying for now.

Resources

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsLaws of FormMathstodon
cc: Research GateStructural ModelingSystems ScienceSyscoi

This entry was posted in Arithmetization, C.S. Peirce, Gödel Numbers, Higher Order Sign Relations, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Quotation, Recursion, Reflection, Reflective Interpretive Frameworks, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Use and Mention, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Reflective Interpretive Frameworks • Incident 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.