Conceptual Barriers • 1

Re: Ontolog ForumJohn Sowa

My first year at college the university held a cross-campus colloquium taking its theme from C.P. Snow’s Two Cultures about the need for and difficulties of cross-disciplinary communication and collaboration in our day.  The university had recently created three residential colleges focused on the arts, sciences, and government/history but designed to provide future citizens with an integrated perspective on how those concentrations fit into the bigger picture of the modern world.

Long time passing, I found myself returning to those very questions around the turn of the millennium, addressing the “problem of silos” and the “scholarship of integration” from the perspective of Peirce’s and Dewey’s pragmatism and semiotics.  Here’s a couple of contributions Susan Awbrey and I made to the area.

Conference Presentation

  • Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (1999), “Organizations of Learning or Learning Organizations : The Challenge of Creating Integrative Universities for the Next Century”, Second International Conference of the Journal ‘Organization’, Re‑Organizing Knowledge, Trans‑Forming Institutions : Knowing, Knowledge, and the University in the 21st Century, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.  Online.

Published Paper

  • Awbrey, S.M., and Awbrey, J.L. (2001), “Conceptual Barriers to Creating Integrative Universities”, Organization : The Interdisciplinary Journal of Organization, Theory, and Society 8(2), Sage Publications, London, UK, 269–284.  AbstractOnline.

I don’t know if the brands of ontologies being cranked out today are going to be the ultimate answer to these problems, but I do think there are applications of logic, mathematical modeling, and pragmatic semiotics that would certainly help a lot.


  • Constraints and Indications • (1)(2)

cc: Ontolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.P. Snow, C.S. Peirce, Conceptual Barriers, Conceptual Integration, Constraint, Indication, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scholarship of Integration, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Two Cultures, Uncertainty and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Conceptual Barriers • 1

  1. Pingback: Conceptual Barriers • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.