Tag Archives: Intelligent Systems

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 2

Re: Cybernetic Communications • SU One thing that interests me here is the relation between narratives and navigation.  Navigation has to do with how we move through actual state spaces while narratives are the tales we tell about past adventures … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 1

Re: Cybernetic Communications • Analyzing Differences of Perceptions/Constructions Susan and I just returned from our annual dramatic immersion in Stratford Ontario and the last play we saw was a playfully dramatic rendition of Milton’s Paradise Lost.  That and the spectacular … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • 1

People interested in category theory as applied to systems may wish to check out the following article, reporting work I carried out while engaged in a systems engineering program at Oakland University. The problem addressed is a longstanding one, that … Continue reading

Posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamical Systems, Dynamical Systems, Graph Theory, Hill Climbing, Hologrammautomaton, Information Theory, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Representation, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Systems, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 5

Re: Ontolog Forum • Bruce Schuman I would call that the pragmatic-semiotic point of view and not find anything shocking in it. One can find earlier foreshadowings — Plato’s Cratylus and the Stoic lekton are often mentioned in this connection … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Bases, Knowledge Representation, Learning, Logic, Peirce, Reasoning, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 4

Re: Ontolog Forum • MW In the systems approach to inquiry I’ve been pursuing, all specifications, state descriptions, or values of variables come in three modalities:  expected, intended, and actually observed. A difference between expectation and observation is accounted as … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Bases, Knowledge Representation, Learning, Logic, Peirce, Reasoning, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Constraints and Indications : 2

Re: Ontolog Forum • JS Coping with collaboration, communication, context, integration, interoperability, perspective, purpose, and the reality of the information dimension demands a transition from conceptual environments bounded by dyadic relations to those informed by triadic relations, especially the variety … Continue reading

Posted in Adaptive Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Constraint, Control, Cybernetics, Determination, Error-Controlled Regulation, Feedback, Indication, Indicator Functions, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Intentionality, Learning Theory, Peirce, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 3

Re: Ontolog Forum • MDeB I remember Doug Medin from the year I was at Illinois and I recall a colloquium talk Frank Keil gave at Michigan State that intrigued me because he echoed ideas from Kant about the synthetic … Continue reading

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Bases, Knowledge Representation, Learning, Logic, Peirce, Reasoning, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment