Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 3

Where is information bred?  In reality or in its stead?

The way signs enter the scene is shown in Figure 2.

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Figure 2

The Figure illustrates a scene of uncertainty which has been augmented by a classification.

In the pattern of classification shown the first three outcomes fall under the sign “A” and the next two outcomes fall under the sign “B”.

  • If the outcomes are things potentially true of an object or situation then the signs may be read as nomens (terms) or notions (concepts) in a relevant empirical or theoretical scheme, in effect, as predicates and predictors of the outcomes.
  • If the outcomes are things potentially worth doing to achieve a goal then the signs may be read as bits of advice or other indicators telling us what actions to try in a situation, relative to our active goals.

This will give us a practical framework for talking about information and signs in regard to communication, decision, and the uncertainties thereof.

cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of FormMathstodonOntologAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 3

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.