Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 4

Re: Ontolog Forum • Matthew West

In the systems approach to inquiry I’ve been pursuing, all specifications, state descriptions, or values of variables come in three modalities:  expected, intended, and actually observed.

  • A difference between expectation and observation is accounted as a “surprise” and calls for an explanation.
  • A difference between intention and observation is accounted as a “problem” and calls for a plan of action.

There’s more discussion in the following article and section.

cc: Ontolog Forum

This entry was posted in Animata, Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Learning Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Peirce, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Inquiry Driven Systems • Comment 4

  1. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 7 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.