One aspect of a sign’s complete meaning concerns the reference a sign has to its objects, which objects are collectively known as the denotation of the sign. In the pragmatic theory of sign relations, denotative references fall within the projection of the sign relation on the plane spanned by its object domain and its sign domain.
The dyadic relation making up the denotative, referent, or semantic aspect of a sign relation is notated as Information about the denotative aspect of meaning is obtained from by taking its projection on the object-sign plane. We may visualize this as the “shadow” casts on the 2-dimensional space whose axes are the object domain and the sign domain The denotative component of a sign relation alternatively written in any of forms, and is defined as follows.
Tables 3a and 3b show the denotative components of the sign relations associated with the interpreters and respectively. The rows of each Table list the ordered pairs in the corresponding projections,
Looking to the denotative aspects of and various rows of the Tables specify, for example, that uses to denote and to denote while uses to denote and to denote
- Peirce, C.S. (1902), “Parts of Carnegie Application” (L 75), in Carolyn Eisele (ed., 1976), The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce, vol. 4, 13–73. Online.
- Awbrey, J.L., and Awbrey, S.M. (1995), “Interpretation as Action : The Risk of Inquiry”, Inquiry : Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15(1), pp. 40–52. Archive. Journal. Online.
Portions of the above article were adapted from the following sources under the GNU Free Documentation License, under other applicable licenses, or by permission of the copyright holders.
- Sign Relation • OEIS Wiki
- Sign Relation • InterSciWiki
- Sign Relation • MyWikiBiz
- Sign Relation • PlanetMath
- Sign Relation • Wikiversity
- Sign Relation • Wikipedia
cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog • Peirce List (1) (2) • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Sign Relations • Discussion 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry