Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 14

Re: Animated Logical Graphs • 81
Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 13

Topics arising in various circles I traverse on the web are flashing me back to my earliest influences in the ways of inquiry driven systems.  Dick Lipton and Ken Regan brought to mind the generative power of negative operations and the specific limits of perceptrons.  Peiyuan Zhu and Henry Story discussed a paper by Michael Heller and Jerzy Król titled “How Logic Interacts with Geometry : Infinitesimal Curvature of Categorical Spaces”.  It was over my head, just a bit, but it reminded me of early questions about logical atoms, individuals, nominalism vs. realism, and quantum logics, not to mention current pursuits in differential logic, all of which feedback into the ouroborian ampheckbaena of \textsc{nand} and \textsc{nnor} among negative ops.

It will be interesting to see what evolves …

Resources

cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics (1) (2)
cc: Ontolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Discussion 14

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.