Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relations • 7

Re: Ontolog ForumJoseph Simpson

JS:
A binary relation is a set of ordered pairs of the elements of some other set.

That is the first definition I learned for binary relations.

Slightly more generally, a binary relation L is a subset of a cartesian product X \times Y of two sets, X and Y.  In symbols, L \subseteq X \times Y.  Of course X and Y could be the same, but that’s not always the case.

I have long used the adjectives, 2-place, binary, and dyadic pretty much interchangeably in application to relations but I developed a bias toward dyadic on account of computational contexts where binary is reserved for binary numerals.

Once again, partly due to computational exigencies, I would now regard this first definition as the weak typing version.

The strong typing definition of a k-place relation L \subseteq X_1 \times \ldots \times X_k includes the cartesian product X_1 \times \ldots \times X_k as an essential part of its specification.  This serves to harmonize the definition of a k-place relation with the use of mathematical category theory in computer science.

When I get more time, I’ll go through the material I linked on relation theory in a slightly more leisurely manner …

Resources

cc: Ontolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Icon Index Symbol, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Ontology, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Relations • 7

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  9. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.