Icon Index Symbol • 8

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs

Re: Peirce List (1) (2) (3)Helmut Raulien

The difference between the two definitions of a k-place relation in the previous post is sometimes described as decontextualized versus contextualized or, in computer science lingo, weak typing versus strong typing.  The second definition is typically expressed in a peculiar mathematical idiom starting out as follows:

A k-place relation is a (k\!+\!1)-tuple (X_1, \ldots, X_k, L)

That way of defining relations is a natural generalization of the way functions are defined in the mathematical subject of category theory, where the domain X and the codomain Y share in defining the type X \to Y of the function f : X \to Y.

The threshold between arbitrary, artificial, or random kinds of relations and those selected for due consideration as reasonable, proper, or natural kinds tends to shift from context to context.  We usually have in mind a specific property or quality marking the latter class as proper objects of contemplation relative to the end in view, and so this relates to both the intensional and the intentional views of subject matters.

To be continued …

Resources

cc: Peirce List (1) (2) (3)

This entry was posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Computation, Data Structures, Deduction, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Icon Index Symbol • 8

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.