In the beginning was the three-pointed star,
One smile of light across the empty face;
One bough of bone across the rooting air,
The substance forked that marrowed the first sun;
And, burning ciphers on the round of space,
Heaven and hell mixed as they spun.
Dylan Thomas • In The Beginning
I need to return to my study of Peirce’s 1870 Logic of Relatives, and I thought it might be more pleasant to do that on my blog than to hermit away on the wiki where I last left off.
Peirce’s 1870 “Logic of Relatives” • Part 1
Peirce’s text employs lower case letters for logical terms of general reference and upper case letters for logical terms of individual reference. General terms fall into types, namely, absolute terms, dyadic relative terms, and higher adic relative terms, and Peirce employs different typefaces to distinguish these. The following Tables indicate the typefaces used in the text below for Peirce’s examples of general terms.
Individual terms are taken to denote individual entities falling under a general term. Peirce uses upper case Roman letters for individual terms, for example, the individual horses falling under the general term
for horse.
The path to understanding Peirce’s system and its wider implications for logic can be smoothed by paraphrasing his notations in a variety of contemporary mathematical formalisms, while preserving the semantics as much as possible. Remaining faithful to Peirce’s orthography while adding parallel sets of stylistic conventions will, however, demand close attention to typography-in-context. Current style sheets for mathematical texts specify italics for mathematical variables, with upper case letters for sets and lower case letters for individuals. So we need to keep an eye out for the difference between the individual of the genus
and the element
of the set
as we pass between the two styles of text.
References
- Peirce, C.S. (1870), “Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives, Resulting from an Amplification of the Conceptions of Boole’s Calculus of Logic”, Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 9, 317–378, 26 January 1870. Reprinted, Collected Papers (CP 3.45–149), Chronological Edition (CE 2, 359–429). Online (1) (2) (3).
- Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.), vols. 7–8, Arthur W. Burks (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1931–1935, 1958. Cited as (CP volume.paragraph).
- Peirce, C.S., Writings of Charles S. Peirce : A Chronological Edition, Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, 1981–. Cited as (CE volume, page).
Resources
cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog Forum • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Peirce Matters • Laws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Thanks, Jon.
Thanks, Jon. I am eagerly waiting for more.
Pingback: Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Preliminaries | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 9 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 11 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 12 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Overview | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 13 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 10 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Icon Index Symbol • 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Preliminaries | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry