Sign Relations • Comment 1

Posted on January 8, 2018 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Semiotic Triangle • John Corcoran

Peirce’s triadic sign relations are sets of ordered triples having the form (o, s, i), where o is the object, s is the sign, and i is the interpretant sign (usually shortened to interpretant).  In other words, a specific sign relation L is a subset of the cartesian product O \times S \times I, where O is the object domain, S is the sign domain, and I is the interpretant domain.

There is more discussion in the following papers:

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic of Relatives, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Sign Relations • Comment 1

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  6. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  7. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  8. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.