Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 3

It helps me to compare sign relations with my other favorite class of triadic relations, namely, groups.  Applications of mathematical groups came up just recently in the Laws of Form discussion group, so it will save a little formatting time to adapt the definition used there.

Cf: Animated Logical Graphs • 60

Definition 1.  A group (G, *) is a set G together with a binary operation * : G \times G \to G satisfying the following three conditions.

  1. Associativity.  For any x, y, z \in G,
    we have (x * y) * z = x * (y * z).
  2. Identity.  There is an identity element 1 \in G such that \forall g \in G,
    we have 1 * g = g * 1 = g.
  3. Inverses.  Each element has an inverse, that is, for each g \in G,
    there is some h \in G such that g * h = h * g = 1.

cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics (1) (2)
cc: Ontolog ForumStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of Form • Peirce List (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 3

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.