C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 4

Re: C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 3
Re: Category TheoryKyle Rivelli

Dear Kyle,

My Inquiry Into Inquiry blog has a Survey page where I collect blog and wiki resources on all the longer-running topics I write and dialogue about.  The following two collections bear on the close relationship, almost a kind of noun-verb or product-process duality, between signs and inquiry.

Especially relevant to the complex of connections Peirce suggests between the main types of signs (Icons, Indices, Symbols) and the main types of inference (Abduction, Induction, Deduction) are my study notes and blog series on Peirce’s Laws of Information, the spirit of which is captured by the following formula.

\text{Information} = \text{Comprehension} \times \text{Extension}

I appear destined to revisit this subject every other summer or so.  Here’s an outline of the last time around.

Probably about due for another return …

Jon

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Peirce MattersLaws of Form

This entry was posted in Abstraction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Phenomenology, Pragmatic Maxim, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Type Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.