C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 5

Re: C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 2
Re: Category TheoryHenry StoryAvi CraimerHenry Story

Dear Avi, Henry,

Diagrams are a mixed bag, a complex and polymorphic species, in Peircean semiotics.  All diagrams in common use, especially in mathematics, involve all three types of signs — Symbols, Icons, Indices — as interpreted by their user communities.  There has been a tendency in recent years to overemphasize the iconic aspects of Peirce’s logical graphs, reading them a bit too much on the analogy of venn diagrams, but their real conceptual and computational power comes rather from their generic symbolic character.

Here’s an intro to Sign Relations from a Peircean point of view, still a bit “working on it” from my POV.

Here’s the skinny on the three main types of signs — Symbols, Icons, Indices — in Peirce’s theory of signs.

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Peirce MattersLaws of Form

This entry was posted in Abstraction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Phenomenology, Pragmatic Maxim, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Triadic Relations, Triadicity, Type Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.