Re: Deborah G. Mayo • R.A. Fisher: “Statistical Methods and Scientific Induction”
As much as I incline toward Fisher’s views over those of Neyman and Pearson, I always find these controversies driving me back to Peirce. It’s my personal sense there’s no chance (or hope) of resolving the issues until we get clear about the distinct roles of abductive, deductive, and inductive inference and quit confounding abduction and induction the way mainstream statistics has always done.
Resources
- This Blog • Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information
- My Notes • Information = Comprehension × Extension
- C.S. Peirce • Upon Logical Comprehension and Extension
cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog Forum • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry