Tag Archives: Inquiry

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 22

Posted on September 16, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Roberto Rovetto (1) (2) RR: What’s your view on: When to create a greater-than-binary relation rather than a binary relation? Consider:  You want to represent some information, statement, or knowledge, without necessarily being forced to limit … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 3

Posted on September 15, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • (1) (2) Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 2 The fact most neglected about the Neglected Argument is its character as an abductive argument, a “Holy Guess” if you will to believe, and as such the … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Balance, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 21

Posted on September 13, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Ontolog Forum • Alex Shkotin AS: Let me underline an important point:  first of all, we have found in nature and society one or another relation and ask how many members each example of this relation can have?  i.e. … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 2

Posted on September 11, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Phyllis Chiasson Re: Peirce List • Edwina Taborsky PC: Phenomenology is (with math) the underpinning of both scientific inquiry and everyday reasoning.  Improve one’s capability for observation and classification and you improve his/her ability to think … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Balance, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • Discussion 1

Posted on September 9, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Inquiry Into Inquiry • On Balance Re: Laws of Form • Peter Jones PJ: I realise, in brief, the extent of your project — Inquiry Driven Systems • Problem but reading your post makes me wonder about the core … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Balance, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Inquiry Into Inquiry • On Balance

Posted on September 8, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Everyone knows what it means to have obstacles to overcome or events to understand and how we go hunting for whatever action, model, or theory will do the trick.  Other times we have a scheme or theory all ready in … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, Balance, Inquiry | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 2

Posted on September 5, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • Gary Richmond JA: Well, it’s true, all science is under construction. But not everything under construction is a science. GR: True.  But I’d suggest that there is no good reason to block the … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Reading Peirce • Discussion 1

Posted on September 4, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jon Awbrey • John Sowa JFS: I detect a prebit of irony in your note. Although I respect Peirce’s ethics of terminology and observe his recommendations when they are appropriate and realistic, I also know that … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Pragmatism, Science, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 20

Posted on August 18, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Information = Comprehension × Extension Re: Category Theory • Morgan Rogers MR: Care to make any of this more precise? [The above] formula, for example? Yes, it will take some care to make it all more precise, and I’ve … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 19

Posted on August 18, 2021 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Category Theory • Henry Story HS: Could one not say that Frege also had a three part relation?  I guess:  for singular terms their Sense and Reference. […] His argument could be explained very simply.  Imagine you start with … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments