Category Archives: Peirce

Time, Topology, Differential Logic • 3

Posted on November 14, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • JA Worldly events are interfering with my concentration quite a bit this week, perhaps for days to come, but it does help to immerse myself in work.  I am starting a blog series to follow … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Change, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Time, Topology, Differential Logic • 2

Posted on November 13, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • JBD • JA • JA Topology is the most general study of geometric space.  It is critical here to get beyond the “popular” accounts and learn the basics from a real math book.  A classic … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Change, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Systems Theory, Time, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Pragmatic Maxims • 4

Posted on November 8, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • (1) • (2) I haven’t been able to do more than randomly sample the doings on the Peirce List for the last half year, being deeply immersed in other Peirce work that I hope to report … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pragmatic Maxims • 3

Posted on November 5, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jerry Rhee Inquiry begins in doubt and aims for belief but the rush to get from doubt to belief and achieve mental peace can cause us to short the integrated circuits of inquiry that we need … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pragmatic Maxims • 2

Posted on November 4, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Jerry Rhee I tend to think more in relative terms than absolute terms, so I would not expect to find an absolute best formulation of any core principle in philosophy, science, or even math.  But taken … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pragmatic Maxims • 1

Posted on November 4, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Here is a set of variations on the Pragmatic Maxim that I collected a number of years ago, along with some commentary of my own as I last left it.  As I understand them, they all say … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Comment 6

Posted on October 28, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Note.  This is a placeholder, to be developed later. Figure 2 shows the implication ordering of logical terms in the form of a lattice diagram. Figure 2. Disjunctive Term u, Taken as Subject Reference Peirce, C.S. (1866), “The Logic of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Belief Fixation, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Comment 5

Posted on September 30, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Let’s stay with Peirce’s example of abductive inference a little longer and try to clear up the more troublesome confusions tending to arise. Figure 1 shows the implication ordering of logical terms in the form of a lattice diagram. Figure … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Belief Fixation, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Comment 4

Posted on August 31, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Many things still puzzle me about Peirce’s account at this point.  I indicated a few of them by means of question marks at several places in the last two Figures.  There is nothing for it but returning to the text … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Belief Fixation, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Comment 3

Posted on July 10, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Peirce identifies inference with a process he describes as symbolization.  Let us consider what that might imply. I am going, next, to show that inference is symbolization and that the puzzle of the validity of scientific inference lies merely in … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Belief Fixation, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments