Category Archives: Sign Relations

Survey of Precursors Of Category Theory • 1

Posted on May 15, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

A few years ago I began a sketch on the “Precursors of Category Theory”, aiming to trace the continuities of the category concept from Aristotle, to Kant and Peirce, through Hilbert and Ackermann, to contemporary mathematical practice.  A Survey of … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Ackermann, Analogy, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Carnap, Category Theory, Diagrams, Dyadic Relations, Equational Inference, Form, Foundations of Mathematics, Functional Logic, Hilbert, History of Mathematics, Hypostatic Abstraction, Kant, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Propositions As Types Analogy, Relation Theory, Saunders Mac Lane, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Surveys, Triadic Relations, Type Theory, Universals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 1

Posted on May 14, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on Inquiry Driven Systems, material I plan to refine toward a more compact and systematic treatment of the subject. An inquiry driven system is a system having among its state variables … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Action, Adaptive Systems, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, Change, Cognitive Science, Communication, Cybernetics, Deduction, Descartes, Dewey, Discovery, Doubt, Education, Educational Systems Design, Educational Technology, Fixation of Belief, Induction, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretation, Invention, Kant, Knowledge, Learning, Learning Theory, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Peirce, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Process Thinking, Scientific Inquiry, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Surveys, Teaching, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Comment 7.5

Posted on May 1, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Suppose we add another individual to our initial universe of discourse, arriving at a three-point universe It might be thought that adding one more element to the universe of discourse would allow slightly more complicated relations to be compounded from … Continue reading →

Posted in Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Matrix Theory, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Comment 7.4

Posted on April 24, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Dyadic relations enjoy yet another form of graph-theoretic representation as labeled bipartite graphs or labeled bigraphs.  I’ll just call them bigraphs here, letting the labels be understood in this logical context. The figure below shows the bigraphs of the 16 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Matrix Theory, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Comment 7.3

Posted on April 23, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Dyadic relations have graph-theoretic representations as labeled directed graphs with loops, also known as labeled pseudo-digraphs in some schools of graph theory.  I’ll just call them digraphs here, letting the labels and loops be understood in this logical context. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Dyadic Relations, Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Matrix Theory, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Comment 7.2

Posted on April 19, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Because it can sometimes be difficult to reconnect abstractions with their concrete instances, especially after the abstract types have become autonomous and taken on a life of their own, let us resort to a simple concrete case and examine the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dyadic Relations, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Matrix Theory, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Comment 7.1

Posted on April 13, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

I wanted to call attention to a very important statement from Selection 7 (CP 3.225–226).  Peirce enumerates the fundamental forms of individual dual relatives in the following terms: 225.   Individual relatives are of one or other of the two forms … Continue reading →

Posted in Dyadic Relations, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Objective Frameworks • Properties and Instances 1

Posted on April 9, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Dealing with sign relations containing many types of signs — icons, indices, symbols, and more complex varieties — calls for a flexible and powerful organizational framework, one with the ability to grow and develop over time.  This is one of … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Icon Index Symbol, Inquiry, Interpretive Frameworks, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Relative Membership, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 5

Posted on March 22, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Howard Pattee At this point we can distinguish two forms of decomposability or reducibility — along with their corresponding negations, indecomposability or irreducibility – that commonly arise. Reducibility under relational composition All triadic relations are irreducible … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Control, Cybernetics, Dyadic Relations, Information, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

Relations & Their Relatives • Discussion 4

Posted on March 19, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Howard Pattee We use this or that species of diagrams to represent a fraction of the properties, hardly ever all the properties, of the objects in an object domain.  The diagrams that Peirce developed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Diagrammatic Reasoning, Diagrams, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce List, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tertium Quid, Thirdness, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments