Re: C.S. Peirce and Category Theory • 3
Re: Category Theory • Kyle Rivelli

Dear Kyle,

My Inquiry Into Inquiry blog has a Survey page where I collect blog and wiki resources on all the longer-running topics I write and dialogue about.  The following two collections bear on the close relationship, almost a kind of noun-verb or product-process duality, between signs and inquiry.

• Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy Inquiry
• Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information

Especially relevant to the complex of connections Peirce suggests between the main types of signs (Icons, Indices, Symbols) and the main types of inference (Abduction, Induction, Deduction) are my study notes and blog series on Peirce’s Laws of Information, the spirit of which is captured by the following formula.

I appear destined to revisit this subject every other summer or so.  Here’s an outline of the last time around.

• Blog Series • { Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Revisited
• Selections • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5) • (6)
• Comments • (1) • (2) • (3) • (4) • (5)
• Discussions • (8) • (9) • (10) • (11) • (12) • (13) • (14) • (15) • (16) • (17)

Probably about due for another return …

Jon

cc: Category Theory • Cybernetics • Ontolog • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
cc: FB | Peirce Matters • Laws of Form