Tag Archives: Pragmatic Maxim

Pragmatic Truth • 2

Posted on July 10, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Truth as the Good of Logic Pragmatic theories of truth enter on a stage set by the philosophies of former ages, with special reference to the Ancient Greeks, the Scholastics, and Immanuel Kant.  Recalling a few elements of that background can … Continue reading →

Posted in Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Coherence, Concordance, Congruence, Consensus, Convergence, Correspondence, Dewey, Fixation of Belief, Information, Inquiry, John Dewey, Kant, Logic, Logic of Science, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Truth, Truth Theory, William James | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Pragmatic Truth • 1

Posted on July 8, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Questions about the pragmatic conception of truth have broken out in several quarters, asking in effect, “What conceptions of truth arise most naturally from and are best suited to pragmatic ways of thinking?”  My best thoughts on that score were … Continue reading →

Posted in Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Coherence, Concordance, Congruence, Consensus, Convergence, Correspondence, Dewey, Fixation of Belief, Information, Inquiry, John Dewey, Kant, Logic, Logic of Science, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Truth, Truth Theory, William James | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6

Posted on February 28, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of work in progress on Inquiry Driven Systems, material I plan to refine toward a more compact and systematic treatment of the subject. An inquiry driven system is a system having among its state variables some … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Adaptive Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Cybernetics, Deduction, Educational Systems Design, Educational Technology, Fixation of Belief, Induction, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretation, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 4

Posted on February 27, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on three elementary forms of inference, as recognized by a logical tradition extending from Aristotle through Charles S. Peirce.  Particular attention is paid to the way the inferential rudiments combine to … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Dewey, Discovery, Doubt, Fixation of Belief, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Invention, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Morphism, Paradigmata, Paradigms, Pattern Recognition, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Surveys, Syllogism, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Pragmatic Maxim

Posted on August 7, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

The pragmatic maxim is a guideline for the practice of inquiry formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce. Serving as a normative recommendation or a regulative principle in the normative science of logic, its function is to guide the conduct of thought toward the achievement of its aims, advising the addressee on an optimal way of “attaining clearness of apprehension”. Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Logic, Method, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 5

Posted on April 23, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of work in progress on Inquiry Driven Systems, material I plan to refine toward a more compact and systematic treatment of the subject. An inquiry driven system is a system having among its state variables some … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Adaptive Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Cybernetics, Deduction, Educational Systems Design, Educational Technology, Fixation of Belief, Induction, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretation, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 3

Posted on April 2, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on three elementary forms of inference, as recognized by a logical tradition extending from Aristotle through Charles S. Peirce.  Particular attention is paid to the way these inferential rudiments combine to … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Dewey, Discovery, Doubt, Fixation of Belief, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Invention, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Morphism, Paradigmata, Paradigms, Pattern Recognition, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Surveys, Syllogism, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Discussion 4

Posted on December 25, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • All Liar, No Paradox Re: FB | Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation • Esteban Trev JA: A statement asserts that a statement is a statement that is false. The statement violates an axiom of … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Nominalism, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Discussion 3

Posted on December 14, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • All Liar, No Paradox Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce Society • Kent Olson KO: The liar paradox is a self-referential paradox, yes? I think Russell answered these. Dear Kent, Russell had no inkling … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Nominalism, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Zeroth Law Of Semiotics • Discussion 2

Posted on October 27, 2022 by Jon Awbrey

Re: All Liar, No Paradox • Zeroth Law Of Semiotics Re: FB | Charles S. Peirce Society • Joseph Harry Paradoxes star among my first loves in logic.  So enamored was I with tricks of the mind’s eye I remember … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, C.S. Peirce, Denotation, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Liar Paradox, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Nominalism, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Zeroth Law Of Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments