Category Archives: Mathematics

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 7

Posted on December 19, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Theorems From Physics? In a way, the relation between “physics space” and “information space” is one of the topics I address in my work on inquiry driven systems.  Here is a pertinent place in … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 6

Posted on December 6, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Alpha Now, Omega Later • Theorems From Physics? • Isomorphism Is Where It’s At In the late 1970s a number of problems in combinatorics and graph theory that I really wanted to know the answers to had driven me … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 5

Posted on December 4, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Isomorphism Is Where It’s At “Are there more good cases of isomorphism to study?” Just off the top of my head, a couple of examples come to mind. Sign Relations.  In computational settings, … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 4

Posted on December 3, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Cristopher Moore on Theorems From Physics? It is critically important to distinguish between the objective landscape, the boolean functions as mathematical objects, and the syntactic landscape, the particular formal language we are using as a propositional calculus to denote … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 3

Posted on December 2, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Theorems From Physics? Bits of Synchronicity … What kind of information process is scientific inquiry? What kinds of information process are involved in the various types of inference — abductive, deductive, inductive — … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 2

Posted on November 30, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

It’s been a while since I threaded this thread — and then there were all the delightful distractions of the holiday convergence — so let me refresh my memory as to what drew me back to these environs. I’m still … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Alpha Now, Omega Later • 1

Posted on November 16, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

I am still in the middle of trying to catch up on some long put-off work but recent discussions of logical graphs and physics and the like on the Peirce List have bestirred me from my grindstone long enough to … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Differential Logic, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

“What we’ve got here is (a) failure to communicate” • 6

Posted on November 15, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Excerpt from Warren S. McCulloch, “What Is a Number, that a Man May Know It, and a Man, that He May Know a Number?” (1960) Please remember that we are not now concerned with the physics and chemistry, the anatomy … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Amphecks, Aristotle, Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Deduction, Duns Scotus, Induction, Leibniz, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Neural Models, Ockham, Peirce, Propositional Logic, Psychons, Relation Theory, Sources, Triadic Relations, Warren S. McCulloch, William James | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Peircean Semiotics and Triadic Sign Relations • 3

Posted on November 1, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Having labored mightily to bring out a new edition of my article on sign relations, including material on the pivotal concept of semiotic equivalence relations which had fallen into obscurity elsewhere, I thought it worth the candle to post a … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Definition and Determination • 10

Posted on October 7, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

The moment, then, that we pass from nothing and the vacuity of being to any content or sphere, we come at once to a composite content and sphere.  In fact, extension and comprehension — like space and time — are … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Semiotics, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments