Category Archives: Inquiry

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 3

Posted on March 5, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Where is information bred?  In reality or in its stead? The way signs enter the scene is shown in Figure 2. The Figure illustrates a scene of uncertainty which has been augmented by a classification. In the pattern of classification shown … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 2

Posted on March 4, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

What is information that a sign may bear it? Three more questions arise at this juncture. How is a sign empowered to contain information? What is the practical context of communication? Why do we care about these bits of information? … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 1

Posted on March 3, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Information • What’s it good for? The good of information is its use in reducing our uncertainty about an issue which comes before us.  But uncertainty comes in many flavors and so the information which serves to reduce uncertainty can … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Logic, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Scientific Method, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 8

Posted on March 1, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on a theory of information which grows out of pragmatic semiotic ideas.  All my projects are exploratory in character but this line of inquiry is more open‑ended than most.  The question … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Communication, Control, Cybernetics, Deduction, Determination, Discovery, Doubt, Epistemology, Fixation of Belief, Induction, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretation, Invention, Knowledge, Learning Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Pragmatic Information, Probable Reasoning, Process Thinking, Relation Theory, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semeiosis, Semiosis, Semiotic Information, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Surveys, Triadic Relations, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 25 Comments

Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 6

Posted on February 28, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of work in progress on Inquiry Driven Systems, material I plan to refine toward a more compact and systematic treatment of the subject. An inquiry driven system is a system having among its state variables some … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Adaptive Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Cybernetics, Deduction, Educational Systems Design, Educational Technology, Fixation of Belief, Induction, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretation, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Mental Models, Pragmatic Maxim, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 4

Posted on February 27, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on three elementary forms of inference, as recognized by a logical tradition extending from Aristotle through Charles S. Peirce.  Particular attention is paid to the way the inferential rudiments combine to … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Deduction, Dewey, Discovery, Doubt, Fixation of Belief, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Invention, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Morphism, Paradigmata, Paradigms, Pattern Recognition, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatic Maxim, Pragmatism, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Surveys, Syllogism, Triadic Relations, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Tone Token Type • Discussion 1

Posted on February 17, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

Re: FB | Daniel Everett DE: People who believe that Peirce’s terms firstness, secondness, and thirdness are complicated might have overlooked the fact that they almost certainly already use two of the three terms via Peirce’s other terms type (thirdness) … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Tone Token Type, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Sign Relations • Semiotic Equivalence Relations 2

Posted on February 16, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

A few items of notation are useful in discussing equivalence relations in general and semiotic equivalence relations in particular. In general, if is an equivalence relation on a set then every element of belongs to a unique equivalence class under … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Sign Relations • Semiotic Equivalence Relations 1

Posted on February 15, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

A semiotic equivalence relation (SER) is a special type of equivalence relation arising in the analysis of sign relations.  Generally speaking, any equivalence relation induces a partition of the underlying set of elements, known as the domain or space of the … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Sign Relations • Ennotation

Posted on February 14, 2024 by Jon Awbrey

A third aspect of a sign’s complete meaning concerns the relation between its objects and its interpretants, which has no standard name in semiotics.  It would be called an induced relation in graph theory or the result of relational composition … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments