Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Ψ

I remember it was back in ’76 when I began to notice a subtle shift of focus in the computer science journals I was reading, from discussing X to discussing Information About X, a transformation I noted mentally as X \to \mathrm{Info}(X) whenever I ran across it.  I suppose that small arc of revolution had been building for years but it struck me as crossing a threshold to a more explicit, self‑conscious stage about that time.

cc: FB | SemeioticsLaws of FormMathstodonOntologAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Definition, Determination, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Ψ

  1. Poor Richard says:

    Norbert Wiener — The best material model of a cat is another, or preferably the same, cat.

  2. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Pragmatic Semiotic Information • Discussion 19 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.