Tag Archives: Pragmata

The object of reasoning is to find out …

Posted on April 20, 2017 by Jon Awbrey

No longer wondered what I would do in life but defined my object. — C.S. Peirce (1861), “My Life, written for the Class-Book”, (CE 1, 3) The object of reasoning is to find out, from the consideration of what we already … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Determination, Dyadic Relations, Fixation of Belief, Inference, Information, Inquiry, Intention, Intentional Contexts, Intentional Objects, Intentionality, Logic, Logic of Science, Objects Objectives Objectivity, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Purpose, Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pragmatic Cosmos • 1

Posted on June 9, 2016 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Michael Harris • Not About Fibonacci I have often reflected on the interminglings of the main three normative sciences.  In one of my earliest meditations I saw Beauty, Goodness, and Truth as the intersecting circles of a Venn diagram, with the … Continue reading →

Posted in Aesthetics, Anthem, Arete, Beauty, C.S. Peirce, Ethics, Knowledge, Logic, Mathematics, Normative Science, Pragmata, Pragmatic Cosmos, Pragmatism, Summum Bonum, Truth, Virtue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Makes An Object? • 2

Posted on October 26, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussison • (1) • (2) Visual metaphors and perceptual analogies can be instructive — they make for most of my personal favorites — but in logic, mathematics, and science our interest extends through the abductive spectrum, from … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Interpretation, Interpretive Frameworks, Intuition, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Manifolds, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Peirce List, Physics, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Process, Process Thinking, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What Makes An Object? • 1

Posted on October 25, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Gary Fuhrman • Seeing Things What makes an object is a perennial question. I can remember my physics professors bringing it up in a really big way when I was still just a freshman in college.  They always cautioned … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Interpretation, Interpretive Frameworks, Intuition, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Manifolds, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Peirce List, Physics, Pragmata, Pragmatism, Process, Process Thinking, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 8

Posted on October 12, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • (1) • (2) Just to review, we were looking at Ashby’s example of a regulation game as given below. I observed that this gives us a triadic relation whose triples are listed next. Sungchul Ji … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 7

Posted on October 7, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Sungchul Ji I invited readers to consider Ashby’s example of a regulation game as a triadic relation whose triples are given by either one of the following tables. Sungchul Ji asked a rather good question … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 6

Posted on October 5, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Just enough time for an incidental observation. Consider the table Ashby uses to describe his first example of a regulation game. A table like that is a compact way of describing a triadic relation, in this case a relation whose … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 5

Posted on October 2, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Recall the game between R and D determined by the following data. Here is Ashby’s analysis of how it plays out. Examination of the table soon shows that with this particular table R can win always.  Whatever value D selects … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 4

Posted on October 1, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Ashby now invites us to consider a series of games, beginning as follows. 11/3.   Play and outcome.  Let us therefore forget all about regulation and simply suppose that we are watching two players, R and D, who are engaged in … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Forgetfulness Of Purpose • 3

Posted on September 30, 2015 by Jon Awbrey

Here is the first part of Ashby’s setup for the schematic example I had in mind. Requisite Variety 11/1.   In the previous chapter we considered regulation from the biological point of view, taking it as something sufficiently well understood.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Ashby, C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Memory, Peirce, Pragmata, Purpose, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment