Tag Archives: Peirce

Precursors Of Category Theory • 2

Posted on December 30, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Thanks to art, instead of seeing one world only, our own, we see that world multiply itself and we have at our disposal as many worlds as there are original artists … ☙ Marcel Proust Precursors Of Category Theory When … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Ackermann, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Carnap, Category Theory, Hilbert, Kant, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Relation Theory, Saunders Mac Lane, Sign Relations, Type Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Precursors Of Category Theory • 1

Posted on December 20, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

A few years back I began a sketch on the Precursors of Category Theory, aiming to trace the continuities of the category concept from Aristotle, thorough Kant and Peirce, Hilbert and Ackermann, to contemporary mathematical use.  Perhaps a few will … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstraction, Ackermann, Aristotle, C.S. Peirce, Carnap, Category Theory, Hilbert, Kant, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Relation Theory, Saunders Mac Lane, Sign Relations, Type Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

“What we’ve got here is (a) failure to communicate” • 6

Posted on November 15, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Excerpt from Warren S. McCulloch, “What Is a Number, that a Man May Know It, and a Man, that He May Know a Number?” (1960) Please remember that we are not now concerned with the physics and chemistry, the anatomy … Continue reading →

Posted in Abduction, Amphecks, Aristotle, Automata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Combinatorics, Deduction, Duns Scotus, Induction, Leibniz, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Neural Models, Ockham, Peirce, Propositional Logic, Psychons, Relation Theory, Sources, Triadic Relations, Warren S. McCulloch, William James | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“What we’ve got here is (a) failure to communicate” • 5

Posted on November 12, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Excerpt from C.S. Peirce, “Minute Logic” (1902), CP 2.144–148 2.2. Why Study Logic? 2.2.5. Reasoning and Expectation 144.   But since you propose to study logic, you have more or less faith in reasoning, as affording knowledge of the truth. Now … Continue reading →

Posted in Anthem, C.S. Peirce, Communication, Meditation, Peirce, References, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Architectonics of Inquiry • 1

Posted on October 23, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton • Teaching Helps Research Along these lines, if somewhat tangentially, are some questions that I’ve wondered about for many years. How do research and teaching interact, and how might they act to catalyze one another in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Discovery, Educational Systems Design, Educational Technology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Instruction, Peirce, Research Technology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Differential Analytic Turing Automata • Discussion 1

Posted on October 14, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton and K.W. Regan • Proving Cook’s Theorem Synchronicity Rules❢ I just started reworking an old exposition of mine on Cook’s Theorem, where I borrowed the Parity Function example from Wilf (1986), Algorithms and Complexity, and translated it … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Logic, Logical Graphs, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Turing Machines | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Definition and Determination • 10

Posted on October 7, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

The moment, then, that we pass from nothing and the vacuity of being to any content or sphere, we come at once to a composite content and sphere.  In fact, extension and comprehension — like space and time — are … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Extension, Form, Indication, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Peirce, Semiotics, Sources | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Definition and Determination • 9

Posted on September 12, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Cathy O’Neil • The Art of Definition In classical logical traditions the concepts of definition and determination are closely related and their bond acquires all the more force if you view the overarching concept of constraint from an information-theoretic … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Definition, Determination, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Phenomenology, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Lambda Point • 1

Posted on August 1, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

A note on the title.  From long ago discussions with Harvey Davis, one of my math professors at Michigan State.  I remember telling him of my interest in the place where algebra, geometry, and logic meet, and he quipped, “Ah … Continue reading →

Posted in Algebra, Amphecks, Boolean Algebra, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Geometry, Graph Theory, Lambda Point, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Topology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How To Succeed In Proof Business Without Really Trying

Posted on July 15, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: R.J. Lipton • Surely You Are Joking? Comment 1 Even at the mailroom entry point of propositional calculus, there is a qualitative difference between insight proofs and routine proofs.  Human beings can do either sort, as a rule, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Animata, Artificial Intelligence, Automatic Theorem Proving, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Computational Complexity, Graph Theory, Logic, Logical Graphs, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Peirce, Praeclarum Theorema, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments