Category Archives: Philosophy

The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes • 1

Posted on February 7, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Being one who does not view Peirce’s work as a flickering foreshadowing of analytic philosophy, logical whatevism, or anything else you want to call it, but leans more to thinking of the latter philosophies as fumbling fallbacks losing what ground … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Inquiry, Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Science, Scientific Method, Semiotics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Ask Meno Questions • Code Meno Code

Posted on February 4, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Adapted from Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems The Trees, The Forest A sticking point of the whole discussion has just been reached. In the idyllic setting of a knowledge field the question of systematic inquiry takes on the following form: … Continue reading →

Posted in Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Automata, Education, Epistemology, Formal Language Theory, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Learning, Meno, Philosophy, Plato, Programming, Programming Languages, Socrates, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Plato’s Puppet Returns

Posted on January 21, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peter Cameron • Discovery and Invention Between the discovery and the invention, Falls the Shadow, who knows, you know, By tracking backward, retracing the steps Of the tourist, who comes not to conquer, But to enjoy the winding stair … Continue reading →

Posted in Anamnesis, Artificial Intelligence, Discovery, Education, Epistemology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Invention, Learning, Meno, Philosophy, Plato, Psychology, Semiotics, Socrates, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Triadic Relation Irreducibility • 2

Posted on January 18, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peirce List • Matt Faunce • Jon Awbrey • Jon Awbrey Though my present object has more to do with the logical and mathematical aspects of triadic relations than it does with their psychological embodiments, the following exchange on … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Teridentity, Thirdness, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Triadic Relation Irreducibility • 1

Posted on January 17, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

The core insight of Peirce’s conceptual system is the recognition that triadic relations are sui generis, constituting a class by themselves.  Understanding the properties of triadic relations and the consequences of their irreducibility is critical to understanding Peirce’s thought and work.  … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Inquiry, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Teridentity, Thirdness, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Tenacity, Authority, Plausibility, Inquiry

Posted on January 15, 2013 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Peter Cameron • Mathematics and Logic My favorite polymathematician, Charles Sanders Peirce, gave a fourfold classification of what he called “methods of fixing belief”, or “settling opinion”, most notably and seminally in his paper, “The Fixation of Belief” (1877).  … Continue reading →

Posted in Authority, Belief, Belief Fixation, C.S. Peirce, Fixation of Belief, Inquiry, Logic, Method, Philosophy of Science, Plausibility, Science, Scientific Inquiry, Scientific Method, Tenacity, Uncertainty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

“Is it possible to advance philosophy today?”

Posted on November 25, 2012 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Stephen Rose Is it possible to advance philosophy today?  To do so, one would have to use terms that appear to have evolved in different disciplines to a point where dialog is almost impossible, even when desired. I suppose … Continue reading →

Posted in Logic, Mathematics, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Science | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Ask Meno Questions • Discussion 3

Posted on October 17, 2012 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Stephen Rose In Aristotle’s De Anima or “On the Soul” there is a fine articulation of the universal join between the body and the soul, one so embedded in the marrow of our culture that it moves and shapes … Continue reading →

Posted in Animata, Aristotle, Cybernetics, Education, Epistemology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Learning, Meno, Philosophy, Plato, Psychology, Semiotics, Socrates, Teaching, Visualization | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Ask Meno Questions • Discussion 2

Posted on October 17, 2012 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Victoria N. Alexander I tend to favor that general way of speaking, having been brought up on classical cybernetics, optimal control, and systems theory, where we think of a system as passing through its state space, controlled by its … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Epistemology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Meno, Optimal Control, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Systems Theory | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ask Meno Questions • Discussion 1

Posted on October 14, 2012 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Victoria N. Alexander I think you are stating several important insights. The word object in pragmatism and pragmatic semiotics has a much wider range of meanings than the extremely reductive sense of a “compact physical object”.  Anyone wishing to … Continue reading →

Posted in C.S. Peirce, Descartes, Education, Epistemology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Learning, Meno, Peirce, Philosophy, Plato, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Socrates, Teaching, Triadicity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment