Relation Theory • Discussion 4

Re: Survey of Relation Theory
Re: Ontolog ForumRavi Sharma

Is there also an attempt at integrating these relation concepts?  Like a meta‑model of relations?

Dear Ravi,

Thanks for the question.  I believe I’d say yes to the first part, since integrating diverse concepts is a big part of what’s called for here.  If we look over the Relational Concepts listed on the above Survey Page, we can see they are all just so many facets exhibited by the family of mathematical objects known as relations.



cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Relation TheoryMathstodon • Laws of Form (1) (2)Ontolog Forum
cc: W3 | RDF Surfaces

This entry was posted in Algebra, Algebra of Logic, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Combinatorics, Discrete Mathematics, Duality, Dyadic Relations, Foundations of Mathematics, Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Type Theory, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Relation Theory • Discussion 4

  1. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.