Relation Theory • Discussion 5

Re: Survey of Relation Theory
Re: Ontolog ForumRavi Sharma

Is there also an attempt at integrating these relation concepts?  Like a meta‑model of relations?

Dear Ravi,

I haven’t run across the concept of a meta‑model before so I wasn’t sure about the second part of your question.  If you get a chance, maybe you can tell me more about that.  Many past discussions of models and their theories tell me a thicket of failures to communicate is almost bound to arise at this point.  One or two pieces I’ve written in the past lay out the landscape a lot better than I’m likely to do off the cuff, so I’ll go look those up, but also see if I can find a fresh perspective on the scene.



cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Relation TheoryMathstodon • Laws of Form (1) (2)Ontolog Forum

This entry was posted in Algebra, Algebra of Logic, C.S. Peirce, Category Theory, Combinatorics, Discrete Mathematics, Duality, Dyadic Relations, Foundations of Mathematics, Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations, Type Theory, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Relation Theory • Discussion 5

  1. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.