Inquiry and Analogy • Measure for Measure
Let us define two families of measures,
by means of the following equations:
Table 14 shows the value of each on each of the 16 boolean functions
In terms of the implication ordering on the 16 functions,
says that
is above or identical to
in the implication lattice, that is,
in the implication ordering.
Table 15 shows the value of each on each of the 16 boolean functions
In terms of the implication ordering on the 16 functions,
says that
is below or identical to
in the implication lattice, that is,
in the implication ordering.
Applied to a given proposition the qualifiers
and
tell whether
is above
or below
respectively, in the implication ordering. By way of example, let us trace the effects of several such measures, namely, those which occupy the limiting positions in the Tables.
Expressed in terms of the propositional forms they value positively, is a totally indiscriminate measure, accepting all propositions
whereas
and
are measures valuing the constant propositions
and
respectively, above all others.
Finally, in conformity with the use of fiber notation to indicate sets of models, it is natural to use notations like the following to denote sets of propositions satisfying the umpires in question.
Resources
- Logic Syllabus
- Boolean Function
- Boolean-Valued Function
- Logical Conjunction
- Minimal Negation Operator
- Introduction to Inquiry Driven Systems
- Functional Logic • Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3
- Cactus Language • Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3 • References • Document History
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Laws of Form • Ontolog Forum
cc: FB | Peirce Matters • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry