Theme One Program • Discussion 5

Re: Peirce ListJerry Chandler

JC:
This post [Theme One Program • Motivation 1] is so muddled
that I gave up on a meaningful scientific interpretation of it.

Dear Jerry,

Thanks for the response.

I heartily agree with the sentiment we need to pay more attention to
Mathematical And Scientific Substance (MASS) and boggle our brains
less about Purity Of Orthodox Faith (POOF).

That is what I hope to do here, on the one hand giving a realistic account of real‑world problems I encountered through the years and along the way describing how the logic of science and the tools of mathematics, especially as articulated by C.S. Peirce and tested in computational experiment, helped to address them or at least to clarify my understanding of their nature.

But that first post is only a preamble, so I hope you’ll stay tuned …

Regards,

Jon

Resource

cc: Cybernetics • Ontolog Forum (1) (2) • Systems Science (1) (2)
cc: Peirce List (12-12) (18-02) (18-03) (20-09) (20-10) (21-10)
cc: FB | Theme One Program • Laws of Form (1) (2)

This entry was posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Computation, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Cybernetics, Formal Languages, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Learning Theory, Logic, Semiotics, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Theme One Program • Discussion 5

  1. Pingback: Survey of Theme One Program • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.