Differential Logic • Discussion 13

Re: Differential Logic • Discussion 12
Re: FB | Peirce SocietyΧριστο Φόρος

Χριστο Φόρος asked whether the difference between qualitative and quantitative information was really all that much of a problem, especially in view of mixed datasets.  As I have encountered it in practice the rub is not so much between different types of data as between the two cultures of quantitative and qualitative research paradigms.

As it happens, my mix of backgrounds often found me employed consulting on statistics at the interface between quantitative and qualitative researchers.  On the qual side back in the 80s and 90s we were just beginning to develop software for ethographic methods, massaging linguistic, narrative, and verbal protocols toward categorical variables and non‑parametric statistics.  I worked a lot on concepts and software bridging the gap between qual and quant paradigms.

The program I spent the 80s developing and eventually submitted toward a Master’s in Psych integrated a Learning module (Slate) and a Reasoning module (Chalk).  The first viewed its input stream as a two-level formal language (“words” and “phrases”) and sought to induce a grammar for the language its environment was speaking to it.  The second was given propositional expressions describing universes of discourse and had to find all the conjunctions of basic qualitative features (boolean variables) satisfying those descriptions.  There’s a report on this work in the following paper.

cc: Category TheoryCyberneticsOntologStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: FB | Differential LogicLaws of Form

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Frankl Conjecture, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Surveys, Time, Topology, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Differential Logic • Discussion 13

  1. Pingback: Differential Logic • Discussion 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.